|
|
|
Bill
Packer
|
|
Phone:
|
|
916-449-1370
|
|
|
|
Bill.packer@acicnet.org
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sacramento to Consider Crash Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
SACRAMENTO – Sacramento is the latest local government in California to consider
imposing an unfair crash tax on out-of-town motorists who are involved in local
auto accidents, said Sam Sorich, president of the Association of California Insurance
Companies (ACIC).
The
Sacramento City Council’s Law and Legislation Committee is scheduled to consider an
ordinance imposing the tax at its meeting Tuesday (July 20) at 3 p.m. The
meeting is at Sacramento City Hall, 915 I Street. ACIC intends to testify against the tax
proposal.
“It is
unfortunate that local governments are adversely affected by the deep recession.
But charging accident victims is unwise public policy and unfair,” said Sorich.
The
proposed Sacramento ordinance anticipates the city contracting with a
third-party vendor that will bill non-residents who are involved in motor
vehicle accidents in Sacramento. Sorich noted that vendors have been hired by several
other California local governments.
In
most cases, the vendor sends bills that are supposed to cover accident response
costs to the victims’ auto insurers. Some insurers pay the bill, others do not.
Therefore, some policyholders can get stuck with the bill. When the bills are
covered by insurance policies, the cost of the bills drive up auto insurance
rates for all motorists.
Sorich
explained,
“ACIC opposes these billing schemes because they impose unfair crash taxes on
insurance customers and could confront insurance company customers with higher
premiums.”
Sorich
pointed out that concerns already have been raised in one municipality – Woodland near Sacramento. The Woodland
City Council adopted a crash tax in June 2009. Since then the Yolo County Grand
Jury has raised questions about the legality of the tax and has found that the
tax does not appear to be producing its projected revenue.
#
# #